Thomas Cavanaugh
University of San Francisco
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.5840/acpaproc20128621
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 53,742
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Danger of Double Effect.P. A. Reed - 2012 - Christian Bioethics 18 (3):287-300.
Who is Entitled to Double Effect?Joseph Boyle - 1991 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16 (5):475-494.
TA Cavanaugh, Double-Effect Reasoning.W. Kaufman - 2008 - Philosophy in Review 28 (2):94.
Double-Effect Reasoning Defended: A Response to Scanlon.T. A. Cavanaugh - 2012 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 86:267-279.
Cavanaugh's Double Effect Reasoning. [REVIEW]J. Carl Ficarrotta - 2006 - Journal of Military Ethics 6 (3).
TA Cavanaugh, Double-Effect Reasoning Reviewed By.Whitley Kaufman - 2008 - Philosophy in Review 28 (2):94-96.
Double-Effect Reasoning—T.A. Cavanaugh.S. J. Andrew Jaspers - 2008 - International Philosophical Quarterly 48 (2):260-262.
Some Light on Double Effect.James G. Hanink - 1975 - Analysis 35 (5):147 - 151.


Added to PP index

Total views
9 ( #865,317 of 2,349,926 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #332,572 of 2,349,926 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes