In Iulian Apostolescu (ed.), The Subject(s) of Phenomenology. Rereading Husserl. Dordrecht: Springer. pp. 107-133 (2020)

Authors
Abstract
In this paper, I contend that there are at least two essential traits that commonly define being an I: self-identity and self-consciousness. I argue that they bear quite an odd relation to each other in the sense that self-consciousness seems to jeopardize self-identity. My main concern is to elucidate this issue within the range of the transcendental philosophies of Immanuel Kant and Edmund Husserl. In the first section, I shall briefly consider Kant’s own rendition of the problem of the Egosplitting. My reading of the Kantian texts reveals that Kant himself was aware of this phenomenon but eventually deems it an unexplainable fact. The second part of the paper tackles the same problematic from the standpoint of Husserlian phenomenology. What Husserl’s extensive analyses on this topic bring to light is that the phenomenon of the Ego-splitting constitutes the bedrock not only of his thought but also of every philosophy that works within the framework of transcendental thinking.
Keywords Husserl, Edmund  Kant, Immanuel  Ego-Splitting  Transcendental Philosophy  Subjectivity
Categories (categorize this paper)
Buy the book Find it on Amazon.com
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Critique of Pure Reason.Immanuel Kant - 1991 - In Elizabeth Schmidt Radcliffe, Richard McCarty, Fritz Allhoff & Anand Vaidya (eds.), Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. Blackwell. pp. 449-451.
Cartesian Meditations.Edmund Husserl - 1960 - [The Hague]M. Nijhoff.
Critique of Judgment.Immanuel Kant - 1790 - Barnes & Noble.

View all 35 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Subjectivity as the Foundation for Objectivity in Kant and Husserl: On Two Types of Transcendental Idealism.Christian Krijnen - 2016 - Meta: Research in Hermeneutics, Phenomenology, and Practical Philosophy 8 (2):280-303.
The Phenomenological Kant: Heidegger's Interest in Transcendental Philosophy.Chad Engelland - 2010 - Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 41 (2):150-169.
The Paradox of Subjectivity.Michael Shim - 2005 - Husserl Studies 21 (2):139-144.
Subjekt Und Erfahrung. Grundlagen Und Implikationen von Husserls Kritik an der Transzendentalen Methode Kants.Vittorio De Palma - 2016 - Meta: Research in Hermeneutics, Phenomenology, and Practical Philosophy 8 (2):304-325.
Affektion Und Zeitlichkeit Bei Kant Und Husserl.Alice Mara Serra - 2016 - Meta: Research in Hermeneutics, Phenomenology, and Practical Philosophy 8 (2):482-501.
Husserl a Problem Istnienia Świata.Piotr Łaciak - 2014 - Folia Philosophica 32:129-156.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-12-31

Total views
171 ( #57,869 of 2,426,350 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
49 ( #16,285 of 2,426,350 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes