Lesbian motherhood and mitochondrial replacement techniques: reproductive freedom and genetic kinship

Journal of Medical Ethics 44 (12):835-842 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper, we argue that lesbian couples who wish to have children who are genetically related to both of them should be allowed access to mitochondrial replacement techniques. First, we provide a brief explanation of mitochondrial diseases and MRTs. We then present the reasons why MRTs are not, by nature, therapeutic. The upshot of the view that MRTs are non-therapeutic techniques is that their therapeutic potential cannot be invoked for restricting their use only to those cases where a mitochondrial DNA disease could be ‘cured’. We then argue that a positive case for MRTs is justified by an appeal to reproductive freedom, and that the criteria to access these techniques should hence be extended to include lesbian couples who wish to share genetic parenthood. Finally, we consider a potential objection to our argument: that the desire to have genetically related kin is not a morally sufficient reason to allow lesbian couples to access MRTs.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Genetic Affinity and the Right to ‘Three-parent IVF’.G. Owen Schaefer & Markus Labude - 2017 - Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 34 (12):1577-1580.
Reproductive cloning combined with genetic modification.C. Strong - 2005 - Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (11):654-658.
Ethical Implications of Permitting Mitochondrial Replacement.Katarina Lee - 2016 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 16 (4):619-631.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-03-02

Downloads
76 (#213,443)

6 months
23 (#116,187)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Giulia Cavaliere
King's College London