Reasoned and Unreasoned Judgement: On Inference, Acquaintance and Aesthetic Normativity

British Journal of Aesthetics 57 (1):1-17 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Aesthetic non-inferentialism is the widely-held thesis that aesthetic judgements either are identical to, or are made on the basis of, sensory states like perceptual experience and emotion. It is sometimes objected to on the basis that testimony is a legitimate source of such judgements. Less often is the view challenged on the grounds that one’s inferences can be a source of aesthetic judgements. This paper aims to do precisely that. According to the theory defended here, aesthetic judgements may be unreasoned, insofar as they are immediate judgements made on the basis of, and acquiring their justification from, causally prior sensory states. Yet they may also be reasoned, insofar as they may be the outputs of certain inferences. Crucially, a token aesthetic judgement may be unreasoned and reasoned, simultaneously. A key reason for allowing inference a serious role in aesthetic judgements emerges from reflection upon the nature of aesthetic expertise.

Similar books and articles

Towards a reasonable objectivism for aesthetic judgements.Elisabeth Schellekens - 2006 - British Journal of Aesthetics 46 (2):163-177.
Erratum.[author unknown] - 2017 - British Journal of Aesthetics 57 (1):117-117.
Aesthetic judgements and motivation.Alfred Archer - 2017 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 60 (6):1-22.
Introduction.María José Alcaraz León - forthcoming - Estetika: The European Journal of Aesthetics 60 (2):107-114.
Can One Be A Quasi-Realist About The Aesthetic?Christopher Dowling - 2006 - Postgraduate Journal of Aesthetics 3 (3):100-109.
Aesthetic Testimony: An Optimistic Approach.Jon Robson - 2022 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
The Limits of Aesthetic Empiricism.Fabian Dorsch - 2014 - In Gregory Currie, Matthew Kieran, Aaron Meskin & Jon Robson (eds.), Aesthetics and the Sciences of Mind. Oxford University Press. pp. 75-100.
Legislating Taste.Kenneth Walden - 2023 - Philosophical Quarterly 73 (4):1256-1280.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-21

Downloads
713 (#24,123)

6 months
181 (#17,547)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Dan Cavedon-Taylor
Open University (UK)

Citations of this work

Autonomy and Aesthetic Engagement.C. Thi Nguyen - 2019 - Mind 129 (516):1127-1156.
Art as a Shelter from Science.C. Thi Nguyen - 2023 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 97 (1):172-201.
Waltonian PerceptualismSymposium: “Categories of Art” at 50.Madeleine Ransom - 2020 - The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 78 (1):66-70.
Engagement Account of Aesthetic Value.C. Thi Nguyen - 2023 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 81 (1):91-93.

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Content preservation.Tyler Burge - 1993 - Philosophical Review 102 (4):457-488.
Categories of Art.Kendall L. Walton - 1970 - Philosophical Review 79 (3):334-367.
Which Properties Are Represented in Perception.Susanna Siegel - 2006 - In Tamar Gendler & John Hawthorne (eds.), Perceptual experience. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 481-503.
Against Gullibility.Elizabeth Fricker - 1994 - In A. Chakrabarti & B. K. Matilal (eds.), Knowing from Words. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Aesthetic Concepts.Frank Sibley - 1959 - Philosophical Review 68 (4):421-450.

View all 24 references / Add more references