ABSTRACTConcepts are traditionally pictured as discrete containers that bring together objects or qualities based on the possession of shared, uniform properties. This paper focuses on a contrasting notion of the concept which holds that concepts are defined by their capacity to reach out and connect with other concepts. Two theories in recent continental philosophy maintain this view: one from Ricoeur, the other from Deleuze and Guattari. Both are offered as attempts to bring art and philosophy into relation, but they differ over how the process of connection is theorized. With Ricoeur, a concept is only a concept if it is inherently predisposed to connect with others, and open to being misapplied through metaphor, whereas, with Deleuze and Guattari, connection is left as the general notion of each and every concept being mutually consistent with other concepts, with the consistency attributed to the external action of “bridging.” The author demonstrates the impact of this difference on how the philosophers perceive the art–philosophy relation, and argues that Ricoeur is better placed to provide a theory of philosophical discourse that is open to the aesthetic. Ricoeur can show it through metaphor, while Deleuze and Guattari can only assert or state an art–philosophy relation through a series of technical claims. The significance of the showing–saying distinction is that it can demonstrate the depth with which conceptual connectivity is located within the philosophers’ respective ontologies, and can help to reveal the value of conceptual connectivity for that ontology.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/20539320.2019.1587965
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 59,775
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

On Sense and Reference.Gottlob Frege - 1960 - In Darragh Byrne & Max Kölbel (eds.), Arguing About Language. Routledge. pp. 36--56.
Models and Metaphors: Studies in Language and Philosophy.William Sacksteder - 1962 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 23 (2):289-290.
More About Metaphor.Max Black - 1977 - Dialectica 31 (3‐4):431-457.

View all 13 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Thinking the Concept Otherwise.Peter Cook - 1998 - Symposium 2 (1):23-35.
The Secret of Theory.Claire Colebrook - 2010 - Deleuze and Guatarri Studies 4 (3):287-300.
Ricœur et Deleuze, lecteurs de Spinoza: Ontologie, éthique, imagination.Luca M. Possati - 2013 - Études Ricoeuriennes / Ricoeur Studies 4 (2):123-139.
Deleuze, Marx and the Politicisation of Philosophy.Simon Choat - 2009 - Deleuze and Guatarri Studies 3 (Suppl):8-27.
The Rise of the Machines: Deleuze's Flight From Structuralism.Edward Thornton - 2017 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 55 (4):454-474.
Flow, Code and Stock: A Note on Deleuze's Political Philosophy.Daniel W. Smith - 2011 - Deleuze and Guatarri Studies 5 (Suppl):36-55.


Added to PP index

Total views
20 ( #524,516 of 2,432,669 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #464,745 of 2,432,669 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes