Genetically Modified Theology: the Religious Dimensions of Public Concerns About Agricultural Biotechnology
Studies in Christian Ethics 14 (2):23-41 (2001)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Reprint years
2003
DOI
10.1177/095394680101400203
My notes
Similar books and articles
What Can Nanotechnology Learn From Biotechnology?: Social and Ethical Lessons for Nanoscience From the Debate Over Agrifood Biotechnology and Gmos.Kenneth H. David & Paul B. Thompson (eds.) - 2008 - Elsevier/Academic Press.
The magic bullet criticism of agricultural biotechnology.Dane Scott - 2005 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 18 (3):189-197.
The transatlantic rift in genetically modified food policy.Celina Ramjoué - 2007 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 20 (5):419-436.
She Came, She Saw, She Sowed: Re-negotiating Gender-Responsive Priorities for Effective Development of Agricultural Biotechnology in Sub-Saharan Africa. [REVIEW]Obidimma C. Ezezika, Jennifer Deadman & Abdallah S. Daar - 2013 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 26 (2):461-471.
Agricultural biotechnology and the future benefits argument.Jeffrey Burkhardt - 2001 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 14 (2):135-145.
Biotechnology and global justice.Tony Smith - 1999 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 11 (3):219-242.
An aretaic objection to agricultural biotechnology.Ronald Sandler - 2004 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 17 (3):301-317.
Seeds of discontent: Expert opinion, mass media messages, and the public image of agricultural biotechnology. [REVIEW]Susanna Hornig Priest & Allen W. Gillespie - 2000 - Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (4):529-539.
Does autonomy count in favor of labeling genetically modified food?Kirsten Hansen - 2004 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 17 (1):67-76.
Asia-Pacific Perspectives on Biotechnology and Bioethics.Darryl R. J. Macer (ed.) - 2008 - UNESCO Bangkok.
How japanese students reason about agricultural biotechnology.Fumi Maekawa & Darryl Macer - 2004 - Science and Engineering Ethics 10 (4):705-716.
The Technological Fix Criticisms and the Agricultural Biotechnology Debate.Dane Scott - 2011 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 24 (3):207-226.
Understanding the scope of farmer perceptions of risk: Considering farmer opinions on the use of genetically modified (gm) crops as a stakeholder voice in policy. [REVIEW]Nicholas P. Guehlstorf - 2008 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 21 (6):541-558.
Ethics of sustainable development – a study of swedish regulations for genetically modified organisms.Mikael Karlsson - 2003 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 16 (1):51-62.
Analytics
Added to PP
2010-08-30
Downloads
203 (#63,335)
6 months
1 (#450,993)
2010-08-30
Downloads
203 (#63,335)
6 months
1 (#450,993)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Resolving Multiple Visions of Nature, Science, and Religion.James D. Proctor - 2004 - Zygon 39 (3):637-657.
Ethics, Biotechnology, and Global Health: The Development of Vaccines in Transgenic Plants.Jason Scott Robert & Dwayne D. Kirk - 2006 - American Journal of Bioethics 6 (4):W29-W41.