Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (5):514-515 (2004)
Boxers and healthcare workers alike should be able to exercise their rightsAlthough there are calls elsewhere to ban boxing, the Australian Medical Association advocates a less restrictive rule. Professional boxers would submit to brain scans and MRIs—but what to do with the results of such tests? Critics say that boxers should decide which risks they take, but boxers are not the only ones in the debate. Healthcare workers understandably want some say in which risks people take, because the hospital is where boxers go when injuries occur . These issues of ethics and obligation are not made easier to resolve by the many disputed comparisons in this debate. Is boxing like other risk taking behaviour? Are physicians like other public employees? Until such questions are answered, a compromise would have check ups made mandatory, without forcing boxers to act on any knowledge gained.There is no shortage of comparisons in the debate over boxing. Boxing, we hear, is like fast food: dangerous yes, but it does offer some benefits. No, the opposing side contends, boxing is like a pistol duel: once considered sophisticated, it is now just a ritualistic violence. Perhaps boxing is like smoking: inform boxers of the risks and let them at it. Then again, if boxing is like smoking, people who do not realise how dangerous it is need protection from it. Depending on who you listen to, boxing is an expression of individualism and personal sacrifice—the next best thing to running your own country—or it illustrates the danger in letting concern for autonomy overstretch the social fabric. And so the comparisons continue, without really convincing anyone. Not surprisingly, reformist proposals that could include mandatory brain scans for boxers are viewed as intrusive …
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Doctors Should Not Try to Ban Boxing--But Boxing's Own Ethics Suggests Reform.R. Gillon - 1998 - Journal of Medical Ethics 24 (1):3-4.
The Not-so-Sweet Science: The Role of the Medical Profession in Boxing.D. K. Sokol - 2004 - Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (5):513-514.
Are Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility Indeterminate?Christian List - 2003 - Erkenntnis 58 (2):229 - 260.
Organized Rifts in the Social Fabric: Sartre on the Phenomenon and Praxis of Boxing.Benjamin Hutchens - 2010 - Sartre Studies International 16 (1):24-39.
Compulsory Brain Scans and Genetic Tests for Boxers--Or Should Boxing Be Banned?M. Spriggs - 2004 - Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (5):515-516.
Teaching Meaningful Work.Christopher Michaelson - 2009 - Journal of Business Ethics Education 6:43-67.
Ethical Dilemmas in Health Care: A Professional Search for Solutions.Helen Rehr (ed.) - 1978 - Published for the Doris Siegel Memorial Fund of the Mount Sinai Medical Center by Prodist.
Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility: Positive, Normative or Value-Laden?Eckehard F. Rosenbaum - 1995 - Journal of Economic Methodology 2 (2):239-258.
Philosophical Reflections on Medical Ethics.Nafsika Athanassoulis (ed.) - 2005 - Palgrave-Macmillan.
Added to index2010-08-24
Total downloads20 ( #235,960 of 2,127,027 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #391,729 of 2,127,027 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.