Aristotle's Concept of Happiness in the 13th Century

Dissertation, University of Toronto (Canada) (1980)

Authors
Anthony J. Celano
Stonehill College
Abstract
The work of the medieval commentators did not cease with the two commentaries of the great Dominican masters. To the contrary, a fresh and invigorating spirit of inquiry can be seen in later commentaries. The post-1277 commentators turn from a literal explanation of Aristotle's words in order to concentrate on more specific problems raised by Aristotle's notion of happiness. A major concern of these men is to determine the role of the separate substances in the human good. . . . UMI ;Albert the Great and Thomas Aquinas are the first to benefit from Grosseteste's translation of Eustratius' investigations into the nature and the cause of the human good. As a result, they have produced the two most important commentaries on the Nicomachean Ethics of the Middle Ages. Albert examines carefully the Aristotelian definition of happiness and furnishes a response to the question of its cause, which undergoes little change in the second half of the thirteenth century. Thomas' commentary on the text of Aristotle is a masterpiece of precision and clarity and renders an accurate explanation of the Aristotelian concept of happiness. ;The first attempts at understanding Aristotle's great work in Ethics are failures because the earliest commentators do not differentiate between Aristotle's notion of happiness and the Christian ideal of beatitude. Only Robert Kilwardby is able to distinguish between earthly and other-worldly perfection without the aid of Robert Grosseteste's translation of the Nicomachean Ethics and the accompanying Greek commentaries. ;In this dissertation I have studied Aristotle's concept of the human good, happiness, throughout the course of the thirteenth century. The main source for Aristotle's teachings on human happiness is the first book of the Nicomachean Ethics, where Aristotle considers the nature and cause of human perfection. His definition of happiness as an activity of the soul in accordance with virtue and his assertion that the human good is within the capabilities of every living person provided some difficult problems for the thirteenth century commentators on the Nicomachean Ethics. The major portion of my study examines in detail the responses of these men to the questions concerning happiness, which arose from their reading of the Aristotelian work
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,226
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics: On Pleasure.Yun Zhang - 2002 - Philosophy and Culture 29 (5):469-484.
Divine and Human Happiness in Nicomachean Ethics.Stephen S. Bush - 2008 - Philosophical Review 117 (1):49-75.
Eudemian Ethics. Aristotle & Anthony Kenny - 2011 - Oxford University Press.
The Nicomachean Ethics.Lesley Brown (ed.) - 2009 - Oxford University Press.
Aristotle and the Virtues.Howard J. Curzer - 2012 - Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-02-04

Total views
0

Recent downloads (6 months)
0

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

My notes