Authors
Barry Smith
State University of New York, Buffalo
Abstract
In a series of recent publications, orofacial researchers have debated the question of how ‘bruxism’ should be defined for the purposes of accurate diagnosis and reliable clinical research. Following the principles of realism-based ontology, we performed an analysis of the arguments involved. This revealed that the disagreements rested primarily on inconsistent use of terms, so that issues of ontology were thus obfuscated by shortfalls in terminology. In this paper, we demonstrate how bruxism terminology can be improved by paying attention to the relationships between (1) particulars and types, and (2) continuants and occurrents.
Keywords bruxism  dental ontology  disease ontology
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Upload history
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Foundations for a Realist Ontology of Mental Disease.Werner Ceusters & Barry Smith - 2010 - Journal of Biomedical Semantics 1 (10):1-23.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

From Defining Art to Defining the Individual Arts: The Role of Theory in the Philosophies of Arts.Aaron Meskin - 2008 - In Kathleen Stock & Katherine Thomson-Jones (eds.), New Waves in Aesthetics. Palgrave-Macmillan. pp. 125--149.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-08-30

Total views
87 ( #105,933 of 2,330,106 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
20 ( #30,803 of 2,330,106 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes