Just Procedures with Controversial Outcomes: On the Grounds for Substantive Disputation within a Procedural Theory of Justice

Res Publica 15 (3):219-235 (2009)

Authors
Emanuela Ceva
Université de Genève
Abstract
Acts of civil disobedience and conscientious objection provide valuable indications of the congruence of political outcomes with citizens’ conceptions of justice and the good. As their primary concern is substantive, their logic seems extraneous to procedural approaches to justice. Accordingly, it has often been argued that these latter condemn citizens to a ‘deaf-and-blind’ acceptance of the outcomes of agreed procedures. A closer analysis of such acts of contestation shall reveal that although, for proceduralism, the outcomes of just procedures cannot be contested as unjust , they may be contested on the ground of values other than justice, such as someone’s religious/ethical allegiances. Proceduralism about justice will be thus shown to be consistent with the commitment to realising certain outcome-oriented values.
Keywords Philosophy   Philosophy   Ethics   Political Philosophy   Philosophy of Religion   Philosophy of Law
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11158-009-9092-4
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 42,172
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Political Liberalism.John Rawls - 1993 - Columbia University Press.
Political Liberalism by John Rawls. [REVIEW]Philip Pettit - 1994 - Journal of Philosophy 91 (4):215-220.

View all 21 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Justice, Legitimacy, and (Normative) Authority for Political Realists.Enzo Rossi - 2012 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 15 (2):149-164.
Beyond Legitimacy. Can Proceduralism Say Anything Relevant About Justice?Emanuela Ceva - 2012 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 15 (2):183-200.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Disagreement and Epistemic Arguments for Democracy.Sean Ingham - 2013 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 12 (2):136-155.
Praying for Outcomes One Knows Would Be Bad.Tj Mawson - 2013 - Religious Studies 49 (4):551-560.
Praying for Known Outcomes.Tim Mawson - 2007 - Religious Studies 43 (1):71-87.
Consequentialism and Decision Procedures.Toby Ord - 2005 - Dissertation, University of Oxford

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-08-29

Total views
97 ( #80,065 of 2,253,661 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #795,528 of 2,253,661 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature