Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (6):383-386 (2014)

Advances in medical technology inevitably bring about different kinds of ethical challenges for practising doctors. The following hypothetical case of assisted reproduction is presented as an example. A boy is born with Edward's syndrome following assisted reproduction. The parents suspect that there has been an error of embryo mix-up. They challenge the parenthood and request a genetic test to determine the biological parentage of the neonate. Should the attending paediatrician in this case accede to the request? We argue that the paediatrician has no legal obligation to offer the test, although it might be lawful and ethical to provide the test subject to the outcome of our proposed three-step risk assessment
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1136/medethics-2012-100793
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 53,742
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Parentage Determination: A Medical Responsibility?Z. Stark & M. B. Delatycki - 2014 - Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (6):387-388.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Euthanasia in Holland: An Ethical Critique of the New Law.H. Jochemsen - 1994 - Journal of Medical Ethics 20 (4):212-217.
Should Doctors Intentionally Do Less Than the Best?J. Savulescu - 1999 - Journal of Medical Ethics 25 (2):121-126.
Autonomy and Futility.William H. Bruening - 1992 - HEC Forum 4 (5):305-313.


Added to PP index

Total views
28 ( #356,112 of 2,349,887 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #511,368 of 2,349,887 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes