An Indecent Proposal: The Dual Functions of Indirect Speech

Cognitive Science 39 (1):199-211 (2015)

Abstract
People often use indirect speech, for example, when trying to bribe a police officer by asking whether there might be “a way to take care of things without all the paperwork.” Recent game theoretic accounts suggest that a speaker uses indirect speech to reduce public accountability for socially risky behaviors. The present studies examine a secondary function of indirect speech use: increasing the perceived moral permissibility of an action. Participants report that indirect speech is associated with reduced accountability for unethical behavior, as well as increased moral permissibility and increased likelihood of unethical behavior. Importantly, moral permissibility was a stronger mediator of the effect of indirect speech on likelihood of action, for judgments of one's own versus others' unethical action. In sum, the motorist who bribes the police officer with winks and nudges may not only avoid public punishment but also maintain the sense that his actions are morally permissible
Keywords Behavioral ethics  Moral psychology  Self‐deception  Indirect speech  Evolutionary psychology
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/cogs.12145
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 40,625
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Logic and Conversation.Herbert Paul Grice - 1967 - In Paul Grice (ed.), Studies in the Way of Words. Harvard University Press. pp. 41-58.
Mysteries of Morality.Peter DeScioli & Robert Kurzban - 2009 - Cognition 112 (2):281-299.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

How the Mind Matters for Morality.Alek Chakroff & Liane Young - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 6 (3):43-48.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Indirect Speech Acts.Nicholas Asher & Alex Lascarides - 2001 - Synthese 128 (1-2):183 - 228.
The Evolutionary Social Psychology of Off-Record Indirect Speech Acts.Pinker Steven - 2009 - International Journal on Humanistic Ideology 2 (1):59-89.
Oppressive Speech.Mary Kate McGowan - 2009 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 87 (3):389 – 407.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-07-31

Total views
15 ( #527,054 of 2,242,359 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #626,607 of 2,242,359 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature