Bioethics and Its Gatekeepers: Does Institutional Racism Exist in Leading Bioethics Journals? [Book Review]

Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 10 (1):7-9 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Who are the gatekeepers in bioethics? Does editorial bias or institutional racism exist in leading bioethics journals? We analyzed the composition of the editorial boards of 14 leading bioethics journals by country. Categorizing these countries according to their Human Development Index (HDI), we discovered that approximately 95 percent of editorial board members are based in (very) high-HDI countries, less than 4 percent are from medium-HDI countries, and fewer than 1.5 percent are from low-HDI countries. Eight out of 14 leading bioethics journals have no editorial board members from a medium- or low-HDI country. Eleven bioethics journals have no board members from low-HDI countries. This severe underrepresentation of bioethics scholars from developing countries on editorial boards suggests that bioethics may be affected by institutional racism, raising significant questions about the ethics of bioethics in a global context

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,429

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Bioethics Around the Globe.Catherine Myser (ed.) - 2011 - Oxford University Press.
Observing Bioethics.Renée C. Fox - 2008 - Oxford University Press.
The Future of Bioethics.Howard Brody - 2009 - Oxford University Press.
Methodological Concerns in Bioethics.Laurence B. McCullough - 1986 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 11 (1):17-37.
On the Nature and Sociology of Bioethics.Mark Sheehan & Michael Dunn - 2013 - Health Care Analysis 21 (1):54-69.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-03-10

Downloads
35 (#330,908)

6 months
1 (#416,470)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?