Public Health Ethics 5 (1):29-37 (2012)

Authors
Sj Chapman
Northwestern University
Abstract
Bitton and Eyal's lengthy critique of our article on unassisted cessation was premised on several straw-man arguments. These are corrected in our reply. It also confused the key concepts of efficacy and effectiveness in assessing the impact of cessation interventions and policies in real-world settings; ignored any consideration of reach (cost, consumer acceptability and accessibility) and failed to consider that clinical cessation interventions which fail more than they succeed also may ‘harm’ smokers by reducing agency. Our article addresses each of these problems, concluding that any consideration of the ethics of promoting smoking cessation in low-income nations should begin and end with the question of whether the strategies to be adopted have any prospect of influencing significant numbers of smokers to quit
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/phe/phr035
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 59,677
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Halliday's ‘The Ethics of a Smoking Licence’.Simon Chapman - 2016 - Journal of Medical Ethics 42 (5):288-290.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Smoking and Social Justice.Kristin Voigt - 2010 - Public Health Ethics 3 (2):91-106.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2012-01-10

Total views
24 ( #442,771 of 2,432,200 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #467,285 of 2,432,200 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes