Environmental Philosophy 1 (1):58-72 (2004)

Abstract
Wilderness and wildness are not related isomorphically. Wildness is the broader category; all instances of wilderness express wildness while all instances of wildness do not express wilderness. There is more than a logical distinction between wildness and wilderness, and what begins as an analytic distinction ends as an ontological one. A more rhetorical representation of this confusion is captured by the notion of synecdoche, where, in this case, wilderness the narrower term is used for wildness the more expansive term. Although this might seem obvious at first glance, I contend that the two concepts are often misused taken as synonyms thus equivocally, setting back the cause of conceptual clarity in environmental philosophy in general, and environmental restoration in particular. One notable outcome has been the unfortunate dichotomy between preservation and conservation resulting in policy choices that needlessly deny integrated alternatives by illicit exclusion. This paper will clarify this confusion by demonstrating instances where the two concepts have been systematically abused—conflated—and show how Henry David Thoreau saw them as importantly separable. Finally, a clearer understanding of the distinctions between the two concepts provides the basis for a viable program of restoration based on an ethics of place
Keywords Applied Philosophy  Contemporary Philosophy  General Interest  Social and Political Philosophy
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 1718-0198
DOI 10.5840/envirophil20041116
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 51,480
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Ecological Restoration Restored.Robert L. Chapman - 2006 - Environmental Values 15 (4):463-478.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Wildness, Wise Use, and Sustainable Development.R. Edward Grumbine - 1994 - Environmental Ethics 16 (3):227-249.
Chiasmic Wildness.Sean Williams - 2006 - Environmental Philosophy 3 (1):6-12.
The Dusty World: Wildness and Higher Laws in Thoreau's Walden.Jim Cheney - 1996 - Ethics and the Environment 1 (2):75 - 90.
The Possibility of Managing for Wilderness.David Graham Henderson - 2009 - Environmental Ethics 31 (4):413-429.
What “Wilderness” in Frontier Ecosystems?J. Baird Callicott - 2008 - Environmental Ethics 30 (3):235-249.
In Wilderness and Wildness.Kate Booth - 2011 - Environmental Ethics 33 (3):283-293.
On Wilderness and People: A View From Mount Marcy.Wayne Ouderkirk - 2003 - Philosophy and Geography 6 (1):15 – 32.
Values Gone Wild.I. I. I. Rolston - 1983 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 26 (2):181 – 207.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2012-03-18

Total views
30 ( #324,057 of 2,330,807 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #395,593 of 2,330,807 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes