Philosophy and Social Criticism 41 (1):69-76 (2015)

In this article I present a critique of the moral permissibility of preventive war. Preventive intervention is a murky issue in the just-war thinking, so just-war doctrine does not provide moral clarity in this debate. By invoking the concept of a just peace, I discuss prevention from a non-interventionist perspective and show how it can be an effective measure for national security and humanitarian policies. I draw on Amartya Sen’s idea of justice to reconstruct a justice-based, non-interventionist platform where, instead of enabling the act of warfare, as is the case if we start from a just-war approach, we are encouraged to devise an option that would make the case for preventive war redundant. I claim that it is high time that we shift our discourse from finding security in resorting to a just war to building security via a just peace.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1177/0191453714553498
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,593
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Slippery Slope to Preventive War.Neta C. Crawford - 2003 - Ethics and International Affairs 17 (1):30-36.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
9 ( #932,909 of 2,462,064 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #298,852 of 2,462,064 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes