1. I think that by emphasizing theoretical spaces of representations, Andy has put his finger on an issue that is key to connectionism's success, and whose investigation will be a key determinant of the field's further progress. I also think that if we look at representational spaces in the right way, we can see that they are deeply related to classical phenomenon of systematicity in representation. I want to argue that the key to understanding representational spaces, and in particular their ability to capture the deep organization underlying various problems, lies in the idea of what I will call.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Strong Semantic Systematicity From Hebbian Connectionist Learning.Robert F. Hadley & M. B. Hayward - 1997 - Minds and Machines 7 (1):1-55.
Systematicity in Connectionist Language Learning.Robert F. Hadley - 1994 - Mind and Language 9 (3):247-72.
Representational Trajectories in Connectionist Learning.Andy Clark - 1994 - Minds and Machines 4 (3):317-32.
Are Feedforward and Recurrent Networks Systematic? Analysis and Implications for a Connectionist Cognitive Architecture.S. Phillips - 1998 - Philosophical Explorations.
Connectionism and Cognitive Architecture.Jerry A. Fodor & Zenon W. Pylyshyn - 1988 - Cognition 28 (1-2):3-71.
On the Proper Treatment of Semantic Systematicity.Robert F. Hadley - 2004 - Minds and Machines 14 (2):145-172.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads143 ( #30,775 of 2,132,893 )
Recent downloads (6 months)15 ( #47,140 of 2,132,893 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.