American Journal of Bioethics 15 (12):42-47 (2015)

Authors
Thomas Douglas
Oxford University
Sarah Chan
University of Edinburgh
Abstract
The prospect of using genome technologies to modify the human germline has raised profound moral disagreement but also emphasizes the need for wide-ranging discussion and a well-informed policy response. The Hinxton Group brought together scientists, ethicists, policymakers, and journal editors for an international, interdisciplinary meeting on this subject. This consensus statement formulated by the group calls for support of genome editing research and the development of a scientific roadmap for safety and efficacy; recognizes the ethical challenges involved in clinical reproductive applications of genome editing but, importantly, rejects the idea that human reproductive germline modification is necessarily morally unacceptable; and highlights the importance of meaningful engagement in discussions of genome editing and the development of regulation and oversight mechanisms to govern future uses of such technologies.
Keywords genome editing  human genetic modification  CIRSPR-Cas9  bioethics
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1080/15265161.2015.1103814
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 62,388
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

In Search of a Post-Genomic Bioethics: Lessons From Political Biology.Sarah Chan - 2018 - History of the Human Sciences 31 (1):116-123.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Human Genome Editing and Ethical Considerations.Kewal Krishan, Tanuj Kanchan & Bahadur Singh - 2016 - Science and Engineering Ethics 22 (2):597-599.
Germline Manipulation and Our Future Worlds.John Harris - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics 15 (12):30-34.
A Humanist Analysis of Ethical Arguments Concerning Germline Genetic Engineering.Faith Louise Lagay - 1999 - Dissertation, The University of Texas Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences at Galveston
Genetic Modification and Genetic Determinism.David B. Resnik & Daniel B. Vorhaus - 2006 - Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine 1:9.
"Playing God" and Germline Intervention.Ted Peters - 1995 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 20 (4):365-386.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-12-04

Total views
51 ( #207,419 of 2,445,508 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #122,302 of 2,445,508 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes