Ruth Chadwick, Henk ten Have, Jfrgen Husted, Mairi Levitt, Tony McGleenan, Darren Shickle & Urban Wiesing
Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 23 (3):255 – 273 (1998)
Analysis and comparison of genetic screening programs shows that the extent of development of programs varies widely across Europe. Regional variations are due not only to genetic disease patterns but also reflect the novelty of genetic services. In most countries, the focus for genetic screening programs has been pregnant women and newborn children. Newborn children are screened only for disorders which are treatable. Prenatal screening when provided is for conditions for which termination may be offered. The only population screening programs for adults are those for thalassaemia carrier status in Cyprus, Greece and Italy. Social responses to genetic screening range from acceptance to hostility. There is a fundamental tension between individual and communi ty in the debates in various European countries about implementation of screening programs. Opposition to genetic screening is frequently expressed in terms of arguments about "eugenics" with insufficient regard to the meaning of the term and its implications. Only a few countries have introduced explicit legislation on genetic screening. Legislation to address discrimination may provide more safeguards than legislation protecting genetic information itself.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis: Does Age of Onset Matter (Anymore)? [REVIEW]Timothy Krahn - 2009 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 12 (2):187-202.
Moral Literacy in Technological Care Work.Jo Krøjer & Katia Dupret - 2015 - Ethics and Social Welfare 9 (1):50-63.
Genetic Testing and Private Insurance – A Case of “Selling One's Body”?D. Hübner - 2005 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 9 (1):43-55.
Similar books and articles
Culture and Genetic Screening in Africa.Ayodele S. Jegede - 2009 - Developing World Bioethics 9 (3):128-137.
Parliament and Screening: Ethical and Social Problems Arising From Testing and Screening for HIV and Genetic Disease.D. Miller - 1996 - Journal of Medical Ethics 22 (6):366-366.
Antenatal Screening and its Possible Meaning From Unborn Baby's Perspective.Sahin Aksoy - 2001 - BMC Medical Ethics 2 (1):1-11.
Is Cystic Fibrosis Genetic Medicine's Canary?Susan Lindee & Rebecca Mueller - 2011 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 54 (3):316-331.
Private and Public Eugenics: Genetic Testing and Screening in India. [REVIEW]Jyotsna Agnihotri Gupta - 2007 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 4 (3):217-228.
The Social Construction of Genetic Abnormality: Ethical Implications for Managerial Decisions in the Workplace. [REVIEW]Alan Strudler - 1994 - Journal of Business Ethics 13 (11):839 - 848.
The Ethics of Genetic Screening in the Workplace.Joseph Kupfer - 1993 - Business Ethics Quarterly 3 (1):17-25.
Predictive Genetic Testing for Conditions That Present in Childhood.Lainie Friedman Ross - 2002 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 12 (3):225-244.
Toward a Realistic Assessment of PKU Screening.Diane B. Paul - 1994 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1994:322 - 328.
Public Policy Implications of Human Genetic Technology: Genetic Screening.Robert H. Blank - 1982 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 7 (4):355-374.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads28 ( #180,902 of 2,158,278 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #355,837 of 2,158,278 )
How can I increase my downloads?