How Stone Tools Shaped Us: Post-Phenomenology and Material Engagement Theory

Philosophy and Technology 32 (2):243-264 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The domain of early hominin stone tool making and tool using abilities has received little scholarly attention in mainstream philosophy of technology. This is despite the fact that archeological evidence of stone tools is widely seen today as a crucial source of information about the evolution of human cognition. There is a considerable archeological literature on the cognitive dimensions of specific hominin technical activities. However, within archeology and the study of human evolution the standard perception is stone tools are mere products of the human mind. A number of recent approaches to cognition challenges this simplistic one-way-causal-arrow view and emphasizes instead the functional efficiency of tools or artifacts in transforming and augmenting human cognitive capacities. As a result, the very idea that tools or artifacts are intimately tied to human cognitive processes is fast becoming an alternative within the cognitive sciences and a few allied disciplines. The present study intends to explore its implications for philosophy of technology. The central objective of this paper is to examine the dynamic and intricate tool-mediated activities of the early hominins through the lens of Don Ihde’s post-phenomenological theory of human-technology relations and Lambros Malafouris’ Material Engagement Theory. Highlighting the key points where these two research approaches, despite their subtle nuances, converge and look capable of mutually catalyzing each other, the paper attempts to show why it is important to bring these approaches together for a more refined understanding of the controversial role these stone tools played in human evolution.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,088

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Artifacts and cognition: Evolution or cultural progress?Bruce Bridgeman - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (3):403-403.
Prosthetic gestures: How the tool shapes the mind.Lambros Malafouris - 2012 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35 (4):230-231.
Immaterial engagement: human agency and the cognitive ecology of the internet.Robert W. Clowes - 2019 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 18 (1):259-279.
Language and tool making are similar cognitive processes.Ralph L. Holloway - 2012 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35 (4):226-226.
Artifacts, Symbols, Thoughts.Kim Sterelny - 2017 - Biological Theory 12 (4):236-247.
What is the future for tool-specific generalized motor programs?François Osiurak - 2017 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 16 (4):701-708.
Process, habit, and flow: a phenomenological approach to material agency.Tailer G. Ransom - 2019 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 18 (1):19-37.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-04-22

Downloads
19 (#705,026)

6 months
2 (#785,137)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Manjari Chakrabarty
Jadavpur University (PhD)

Citations of this work

Mind and material engagement.Lambros Malafouris - 2019 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 18 (1):1-17.
Ecological-enactive scientific cognition: modeling and material engagement.Giovanni Rolla & Felipe Novaes - 2022 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 21 (3):625-643.

Add more citations