Imagination, indexicality, and intensions [Book Review]

Abstract
John Perry's book Knowledge, Possibility, and Consciousness is a lucid and engaging defense of a physicalist view of consciousness against various anti-physicalist arguments. In what follows, I will address Perry's responses to the three main anti-physicalist arguments he discusses: the zombie argument , the knowledge argument , and the modal argument
Keywords Imagination  Indexicality  Intension  Metaphysics  Zombie
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1933-1592.2004.tb00334.x
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 29,440
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Does Conceivability Entail Possibility?David J. Chalmers - 2002 - In Tamar S. Gendler & John Hawthorne (eds.), Conceivability and Possibility. Oxford University Press. pp. 145--200.
The Content and Epistemology of Phenomenal Belief.David J. Chalmers - 2003 - In Quentin Smith & Aleksandar Jokic (eds.), Consciousness: New Philosophical Perspectives. Oxford University Press. pp. 220--72.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
There It Is.Benj Hellie - 2011 - Philosophical Issues 21 (1):110-164.
The Knowledge Argument and Objectivity.Robert J. Howell - 2007 - Philosophical Studies 135 (2):145-177.

View all 13 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index
2009-04-06

Total downloads
320 ( #9,479 of 2,180,202 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #105,115 of 2,180,202 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums