Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 6 (1):96-119 (2003)
Freedom has a number of different senses. One of them is the absence of domination, which neo-republican thinkers have helped us to understand better. This notion of freedom does not, however, provide an alternative to political liberalism, since its proper articulation depends on distinctly liberal principles
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Freedom as Non-Domination: Radicalisation or Retreat?Cillian McBride - 2015 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 18 (4):349-374.
Similar books and articles
Discourse Theory and Republican Freedom.Philip Pettit - 2003 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 6 (1):72-95.
The Anti-Catholic Roots of Liberal and Republican Conceptions of Freedom in English Political Thought.Clement Fatovic - 2005 - Journal of the History of Ideas 66 (1):37-58.
Republican Freedom, Rights, and the Coalition Problem.K. Dowding - 2011 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 10 (3):301-322.
The Impossibility of a Paretian Republican? Some Comments on Pettit and Sen.Christian List - 2004 - Economics and Philosophy 20 (1):65-87.
Republican Moments in Political Liberalism.Anthony Simon Laden - 2001 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 1 (3):217-237.
A Note on List's Modal Logic of Republican Freedom.Boudewijn de Bruin - 2008 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 7 (3):341-349.
Added to index2010-08-10
Total downloads105 ( #46,839 of 2,158,310 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #133,489 of 2,158,310 )
How can I increase my downloads?