Liberalism: A Tyrannical Paradox?

Telos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary 2011 (154):181-183 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

ExcerptAt first glance, the title of Kalb's new book The Tyranny of Liberalism seems to be an oxymoron. How can a theory of liberalism result in something illiberal? Liberalism is designed to give people freedom, so how can it be tyrannical? This is what Kalb attempts to show: the paradoxical nature of liberalism, and how it is self-defeating. To Kalb there are two main problems with contemporary liberalism: first, liberalism is tyrannical, insofar as it does not allow for any dissension or criticism of itself; and second, the logic of liberalism is based on the false assumption that human societal…

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,449

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

How can political liberalism respond to contemporary populism?Andrew Reid - 2020 - European Journal of Political Theory 21 (2):147488512091130.
Isaiah Berlin as Essayist.Jason Ferrell - 2012 - Political Theory 40 (5):602-628.
Capabilities, Political Liberalism and Private Law.Thom Brooks - 2018 - Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie 104 (4):556-569.
Brexit, Post-liberalism, and the Politics of Paradox.A. Pabst - 2016 - Telos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary 2016 (176):189-201.
Political or Moral?An-kui Tan - 2007 - Modern Philosophy 5:99-104.
Human flourishing, liberal theory and the arts.Menachem Mautner - 2018 - New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-03

Downloads
61 (#363,736)

6 months
6 (#572,300)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Roger Chao
La Trobe University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references