Colin Chamberlain
Temple University
Malebranche holds that visual experience represents the size of objects relative to the perceiver's body and does not represent objects as having intrinsic or nonrelational spatial magnitudes. I argue that Malebranche's case for this body-relative thesis is more sophisticated than other commentators—most notably, Atherton and Simmons —have presented it. Malebranche's central argument relies on the possibility of perceptual variation with respect to size. He uses two thought experiments to show that perceivers of different sizes—namely, miniature people, giants, and typical human beings—can experience the very same objects as having radically different sizes. Malebranche argues that there is no principled reason to privilege one of these ways of experiencing size over the others and, more specifically, that all three kinds of perceivers experience size veridically. From the possibility of this kind of veridical perceptual variation, Malebranche infers that visual experience represents only body-relative size.
Keywords Malebranche  contents of perception  spatial perception  scale  body-relativity
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/apa.2019.44
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Phenomenal Character.Sydney Shoemaker - 1994 - Noûs 28 (1):21-38.
The Spatial Content of Experience.Brad Thompson - 2010 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 81 (1):146-184.
The Search After Truth.Nicholas Malebranche, Thomas M. Lennon & Paul J. Olscamp - 1982 - Philosophy of Science 49 (1):146-147.
How the World Is Measured Up in Size Experience.David J. Bennett - 2011 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 83 (2):345-365.
Malebranche and British Philosophy.Charles Mccracken - 1983 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 173 (4):467-468.

View all 15 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Nicolas Malebranche.Tad Schmaltz - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Malebranche on Descartes on Mind-Body Distinctness.Tad M. Schmaltz - 1994 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 32 (4):573-603.
Descartes and Malebranche on Thought, Sensation and the Nature of the Mind.Antonia Lolordo - 2005 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 43 (4):387-402.
Malebranche and the Riddle of Sensation.Walter Ott - 2014 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 88 (3):689-712.
Descartes, Malebranche, and the Crisis of Perception.Walter Ott - 2017 - Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Malebranche: Rationalist Or Mystic?Panagiota Xirogianni - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 45:393-400.
Malebranche on Mind.Julie Walsh - 2018 - In Rebecca Copenhaver & C. Shields (eds.), The History of the Philosophy of Mind, 6 Volumes. pp. Chapter 5, Volume 4.


Added to PP index

Total views
144 ( #81,180 of 2,506,036 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
30 ( #29,989 of 2,506,036 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes