Masculine domination and radical feminism
Feminists are starting to look to the work of Pierre Bourdieu, in the hope that it might provide a useful framework for conceptualising the tension between structure and agency in questions of gender. This paper argues that Bourdieu’s analysis of gender can indeed be useful to feminists, but that the options Bourdieu offers for change are problematic. The paper suggests that Bourdieu’s analysis of gender echoes the work of earlier radical feminists, particularly Catharine MacKinnon, in important ways. Consciousness-raising, one of MacKinnon’s strategies for change, sits well with Bourdieu’s concept of habitus, despite Bourdieu’s own scepticism. The paper argues that recasting the role of consciousness-raising in Bourdieu’s theory helps to undermine the deterministic elements of his work. It concludes that a feminist turn to Bourdieu as an attempt to understand gender’s entrenchment-andmalleability can be fruitful, and that such a turn might find a re-engagement with the idea of consciousness-raising helpful.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Bourdieu, Flaubert, and the Sociology of Literature.Jonathan Eastwood - 2007 - Sociological Theory 25 (2):149 - 169.
Deconstructing Pierre Bourdieu: Against Sociological Terrorism From the Left.Jeannine Verdès-Leroux - 2001 - Algora.
Added to index2010-03-05
Total downloads19 ( #259,718 of 2,171,692 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?