Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 100 (1):93–113 (2000)
This paper treats a question which first arose in these Proceedings: Can Anselm's ontological argument be inverted so as to yield parallel proofs for the existence (or non-existence) of a least (or worst) conceivable being? Such 'devil parodies' strike some commentators as innocuous curiosities, or redundant challenges which are no more troubling than other parodies found in the literature (e.g., Gaunilo's Island). I take issue with both of these allegations; devil parodies, I argue, have the potential to pose substantive, and novel, challenges to Anselm's ontological argument
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Reading Anselm's Proslogion: The History of Anselm's Argument and its Significance Today.Ian Logan - 2008 - Ashgate.
St. Anselm's Proslogion with a Reply on Behalf of the Fool. Anselm - 1979 - University of Notre Dame Press.
The Relevance of Kant's Objection to Anselm's Ontological Argument.Chris Heathwood - 2011 - Religious Studies 47 (3):345-357.
Anselm, Gaunilo, and Lost Island.Keith Burgess-Jackson - 1994 - Philosophy and Theology 8 (3):243-249.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads55 ( #89,952 of 2,126,924 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #201,338 of 2,126,924 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.