Pandemic Ethics and Status Quo Risk

Public Health Ethics 15 (1):64-73 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Conservative assumptions in medical ethics risk immense harms during a pandemic. Public health institutions and public discourse alike have repeatedly privileged inaction over aggressive medical interventions to address the pandemic, perversely increasing population-wide risks while claiming to be guided by ‘caution’. This puzzling disconnect between rhetoric and reality is suggestive of an underlying philosophical confusion. In this paper, I argue that we have been misled by status quo bias—exaggerating the moral significance of the risks inherent in medical interventions, while systematically neglecting the risks inherent in the status quo prospect of an out-of-control pandemic. By coming to appreciate the possibility and significance of status quo risk, we will be better prepared to respond appropriately when the next pandemic strikes.

Similar books and articles

Disability, Disablism, and COVID-19 Pandemic Triage.Jackie Leach Scully - 2020 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 17 (4):601-605.
Impacts of COVID19 Pandemic on Care of the Patients with Cancer.Esra Bilir - 2020 - Eubios Journal of Asian and International Bioethics 30 (3):111-113.


Added to PP

649 (#26,423)

6 months
140 (#25,278)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Richard Y. Chappell
University of Miami

Citations of this work

Epistemic Courage.Jonathan Ichikawa - 2024 - Oxford: Oxford University Press.
How to deal with risks of AI suffering.Leonard Dung - forthcoming - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy.

Add more citations