Response to Scott Soames on two-dimensionalism

Abstract

At the April 2006 meeting of the Central Division of the American Philosophical Association, in an author-meets-critics session on Scott Soames' book _Reference and Description: The Case Against Two-Dimensionalism_ , I presented a comment on Soames' book, "Scott Soames' Two-Dimensionalism" . The other critic was Robert Stalnaker. Soames presented his response to critics . Below is a reply to Soames' response to me, for those who were at the session and interested others. Note that this response was mostly written before the session, except for one or two paragraphs where the discussion in the session is mentioned

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,038

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Soames’s argument 1 against strong two-dimensionalism.Robert Michels - 2012 - Philosophical Studies 161 (3):403-420.
Doing philosophy with words.Brian Weatherson - 2007 - Philosophical Studies 135 (3):429 - 437.
Soames and Zalabardo on kripke’s Wittgenstein.Jussi Haukioja - 2002 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 64 (1):157-73.
Reference and Description: The Case Against Two-Dimensionalism.Scott Soames - 2005 - Princeton: Princeton University Press. Edited by Frank Jackson & Michael Smith.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
298 (#68,260)

6 months
4 (#792,283)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David Chalmers
New York University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references