At the April 2006 meeting of the Central Division of the American Philosophical Association, in an author-meets-critics session on Scott Soames' book _Reference and Description: The Case Against Two-Dimensionalism_ , I presented a comment on Soames' book, "Scott Soames' Two-Dimensionalism" . The other critic was Robert Stalnaker. Soames presented his response to critics . Below is a reply to Soames' response to me, for those who were at the session and interested others. Note that this response was mostly written before the session, except for one or two paragraphs where the discussion in the session is mentioned
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Soames and Zalabardo on Kripke's Wittgenstein.Jussi Haukioja - 2002 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 64 (1):157-73.
Doing Philosophy with Words. [REVIEW]Brian Weatherson - 2007 - Philosophical Studies 135 (3):429 - 437.
The Substance and Significance of the Dispute Over Two-Dimensionalism.Scott Soames - 2007 - Philosophical Books 48 (1):34-49.
Reference and Description: The Case Against Two-Dimensionalism (Review of Scott Soames' Book).Eros Corazza - 2005 - Philosophy Reviews.
Soames's Argument 1 Against Strong Two-Dimensionalism.Robert Michels - 2012 - Philosophical Studies 161 (3):403-420.
Reference and Description: The Case Against Two-Dimensionalism.Scott Soames - 2005 - Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads236 ( #13,934 of 2,143,808 )
Recent downloads (6 months)18 ( #25,450 of 2,143,808 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.