Authors
Brian A. Chance
University of Oklahoma
Abstract
Kant's response to scepticism in the Critique of Pure Reason is complex and remarkably nuanced, although it is rarely recognized as such. In this paper, I argue that recent attempts to flesh out the details of this response by Paul Guyer and Michael Forster do not go far enough. Although they are right to draw a distinction between Humean and Pyrrhonian scepticism and locate Kant's response to the latter in the Transcendental Dialectic, their accounts fail to capture two important aspects of this response. The first is that Kant's response to Pyrrhonian scepticism is also a response to Hume. The second is that aspects of this response are decidedly positive. In particular, I argue (1) that Kant believed Hume's scepticism manifested important elements of Pyrrhonian scepticism and (2) that both Pyrrhonian scepticism and Hume had a significant positive influence on the development of the Transcendental Dialectic.
Keywords Hume
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/09608788.2012.664025
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Critique of Pure Reason.Immanuel Kant - 1998 - Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kant's Transcendental Idealism.Henry E. Allison - 1988 - Yale University Press.
Kant and the Claims of Knowledge.Paul Guyer - 1987 - Cambridge University Press.
Lectures on Logic.Immanuel KANT - 1992 - Cambridge University Press.

View all 25 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Kant and the Discipline of Reason.Brian A. Chance - 2016 - European Journal of Philosophy 24 (2):87-110.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Scepticism, Relativism and the Argument From the Criterion.Howard Sankey - 2012 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 43 (1):182-190.
The Naturalistic Response to Scepticism.Ruth Weintraub - 2003 - Philosophy 78 (3):369-386.
Hegel's Manifold Response to Scepticism in the Phenomenology of Spirit.Kenneth R. Westphal - 2003 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 103 (2):149–178.
Moderate Classy Pyrrhonian Moral Scepticism.Walter Sinnott-Armstrong - 2008 - Philosophical Quarterly 58 (232):448–456.
Practical Reason and Motivational Scepticism.Paul Russell - 2006 - In Heiner F. Klemme, Manfred Kühn & Dieter Schönecker (eds.), Moralische Motivation. Kant und die Alternativen. Felix Meiner Verlag.
Psychological and Social Aspects of Pyrrhonian Scepticism.Arne Naess - 1966 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 9 (1-4):301 – 321.
Radical Scepticism Without Epistemic Closure.Sven Rosenkranz - 2012 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 85 (3):692-718.
Silencing the Philosopher.Ioannis Trisokkas - 2011 - Babilonia 10:61-75.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2012-04-19

Total views
219 ( #41,233 of 2,411,664 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
14 ( #49,335 of 2,411,664 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes