Faith and Philosophy 10 (1):18-32 (1993)

Authors
Hugh Chandler
University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
Abstract
This was an attempt to show what is wrong with Anselm’s ‘Ontological Argument’ for the existence of God. My present view is that Peter Millican has given us a similar, but much better line of attack in his “The One Fatal Flaw….” Paper.
Keywords Anselm  The 'Ontological Argument'  The existence of God
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0739-7046
DOI 10.5840/faithphil199310112
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 59,018
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Ontological Arguments.Graham Oppy - 2014 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-07-09

Total views
161 ( #61,797 of 2,427,518 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #146,134 of 2,427,518 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes