Some Ontological Arguments

Faith and Philosophy 10 (1):18-32 (1993)

Authors
Hugh Chandler
University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
Abstract
This was an attempt to show what is wrong with Anselm’s ‘Ontological Argument’ for the existence of God. My present view is that Peter Millican has given us a similar, but much better line of attack in his “The One Fatal Flaw….” Paper.
Keywords Anselm  The 'Ontological Argument'  The existence of God
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.5840/faithphil199310112
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 39,607
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Ontological Arguments and Belief in God.Graham Oppy - 1995 - Cambridge University Press.
Thought Experimenting with God. Revisiting the Ontological Argument.Yiftach J. H. Fehige - 2009 - Neue Zeitschrift für Systematicsche Theologie Und Religionsphilosophie 51 (3):249-267.
The Ontological Argument and the Devil.Yujin Nagasawa - 2010 - Philosophical Quarterly 60 (238):72-91.
Alvin Plantinga on the Ontological Argument.William L. Rowe - 2009 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 65 (2):87 - 92.
Millican on the Ontological Argument.Yujin Nagasawa - 2007 - Mind 116 (464):1027-1040.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-07-09

Total views
138 ( #49,434 of 2,325,334 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #269,290 of 2,325,334 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature