Some Ontological Arguments
Faith and Philosophy 10 (1):18-32 (1993)
| Authors |
Hugh Chandler
University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
|
| Abstract |
This was an attempt to show what is wrong with Anselm’s ‘Ontological Argument’ for the existence of God. My present view is that Peter Millican has given us a similar, but much better line of attack in his “The One Fatal Flaw….” Paper.
|
| Keywords | Anselm The 'Ontological Argument' The existence of God |
| Categories | (categorize this paper) |
| DOI | 10.5840/faithphil199310112 |
| Options |
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Request removal from index
|
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Gottesbeweis Oder Gedankenexperiment Christlicher Theologie? Zu Dombrowskis Verteidigung des Ontologischen Arguments.J. H. Yiftach - 2009 - Jahrbuch für Religionsphilosophie 8:69-91.
Thought Experimenting with God. Revisiting the Ontological Argument.Yiftach J. H. Fehige - 2009 - Neue Zeitschrift für Systematicsche Theologie Und Religionsphilosophie 51 (3):249-267.
The Ontological Argument and the Devil.Yujin Nagasawa - 2010 - Philosophical Quarterly 60 (238):72-91.
The Relevance of Kant's Objection to Anselm's Ontological Argument.Chris Heathwood - 2011 - Religious Studies 47 (3):345-357.
Ontological Arguments and the Superiority of Existence: Reply to Nagasawa.Peter Millican - 2007 - Mind 116 (464):1041-1054.
Alvin Plantinga on the Ontological Argument.William L. Rowe - 2009 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 65 (2):87 - 92.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2009-07-09
Total views
138 ( #49,434 of 2,325,334 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #269,290 of 2,325,334 )
2009-07-09
Total views
138 ( #49,434 of 2,325,334 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #269,290 of 2,325,334 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads
