Faith and Philosophy 10 (1):18-32 (1993)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
This was an attempt to show what is wrong with Anselm’s ‘Ontological Argument’ for the existence of God. My present view is that Peter Millican has given us a similar, but much better line of attack in his “The One Fatal Flaw….” Paper.
|
Keywords | Anselm The 'Ontological Argument' The existence of God |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
ISBN(s) | 0739-7046 |
DOI | 10.5840/faithphil199310112 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
The Divine Fractal: 1st Order Extensional Theology.Paul Studtmann - 2022 - Philosophia 50 (1):285-305.
Similar books and articles
Ontological Arguments and Belief in God.Graham Oppy - 1995 - Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.
Alvin Plantinga on the Ontological Argument.William L. Rowe - 2009 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 65 (2):87 - 92.
Ontological Arguments and the Superiority of Existence: Reply to Nagasawa.Peter Millican - 2007 - Mind 116 (464):1041-1054.
The Relevance of Kant's Objection to Anselm's Ontological Argument.Chris Heathwood - 2011 - Religious Studies 47 (3):345-357.
The Ontological Argument and the Devil.Yujin Nagasawa - 2010 - Philosophical Quarterly 60 (238):72-91.
Gottesbeweis Oder Gedankenexperiment Christlicher Theologie? Zu Dombrowskis Verteidigung des Ontologischen Arguments.J. H. Yiftach - 2009 - Jahrbuch für Religionsphilosophie 8:69-91.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2009-07-09
Total views
171 ( #67,663 of 2,499,195 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #101,998 of 2,499,195 )
2009-07-09
Total views
171 ( #67,663 of 2,499,195 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #101,998 of 2,499,195 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads