Faith and Philosophy 10 (1):18-32 (1993)

Hugh Chandler
University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
This was an attempt to show what is wrong with Anselm’s ‘Ontological Argument’ for the existence of God. My present view is that Peter Millican has given us a similar, but much better line of attack in his “The One Fatal Flaw….” Paper.
Keywords Anselm  The 'Ontological Argument'  The existence of God
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0739-7046
DOI 10.5840/faithphil199310112
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,114
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Ontological Arguments.Graham Oppy - 2014 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
171 ( #67,663 of 2,499,195 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #101,998 of 2,499,195 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes