Scientific Ontology: Integrating Naturalized Metaphysics and Voluntarist Epistemology

Oxford University Press (2017)

Authors
Anjan Chakravartty
University of Miami
Abstract
Both science and philosophy are interested in questions of ontology- questions about what exists and what these things are like. Science and philosophy, however, seem like very different ways of investigating the world, so how should one proceed? Some defer to the sciences, conceived as something apart from philosophy, and others to metaphysics, conceived as something apart from science, for certain kinds of answers. This book contends that these sorts of deference are misconceived. A compelling account of ontology must appreciate the ways in which the sciences incorporate metaphysical assumptions and arguments. At the same time, it must pay careful attention to how observation, experience, and the empirical dimensions of science are related to what may be viewed as defensible philosophical theorizing about ontology. The promise of an effectively naturalized metaphysics is to encourage beliefs that are formed in ways that do justice to scientific theorizing, modeling, and experimentation. But even armed with such a view, there is no one, uniquely rational way to draw lines between domains of ontology that are suitable for belief, and ones in which it would be better to suspend belief instead. In crucial respects, ontology is in the eye of the beholder: it is Informed by underlying commitments with implications for the limits of inquiry, which inevitably vary across rational inquirers. As a result, the proper scope of ontology is subject to a striking form of voluntary choice, yielding a new and transformative conception of scientific ontology.
Keywords Scientific Ontology  Voluntarist Epistemology  Naturalized Metaphysics
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 9780190651459  
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 44,462
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Perspectival Modeling.Michela Massimi - 2018 - Philosophy of Science 85 (3):335-359.
II—Relativist Stances, Virtues And Vices.Martin Kusch - 2019 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 93 (1):271-291.
Cautious Realism and Middle Range Ontology.P. D. Magnus - 2018 - Metascience 27 (3):365-370.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Towards an Ontology of Scientific Models.S. Ducheyne - 2008 - Metaphysica 9 (1):119-127.
Ontological Frameworks for Scientific Theories.Jonas R. B. Arenhart - 2012 - Foundations of Science 17 (4):339-356.
Normative Epistemology and Naturalized Epistemology.Harold I. Brown - 1988 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 31 (1):53 – 78.
Can Metaphysics Be Naturalized? And If So, How?Andrew Melnyk - 2013 - In Don Ross, James Ladyman & Harold Kincaid (eds.), Scientific Metaphysics. Oxford University Press. pp. 79-95.
Quine. Naturalized Epistemology, Perceptual Knowledge and Ontology.Lieven Decock & Leon Horsten (eds.) - 2000 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities, Rodopi.
On the Prospects of Naturalized Metaphysics.Anjan Chakravartty - 2013 - In Don Ross, James Ladyman & Harold Kincaid (eds.), Scientific Metaphysics. Oxford University Press. pp. 27-50.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-09-18

Total views
7 ( #897,934 of 2,273,203 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #321,436 of 2,273,203 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature