Ratio 1 (2):163-175 (1988)

Authors
Charles Sayward
University of Nebraska, Lincoln
Abstract
The fundamental thought of moral relativism is set out as follows: moral criteria, derived from overall moral points of view, are used to derive particular moral judgments. Thus such a judgment might be correct relative to one overall moral point of view and incorrect relative to another. The evaluation of an overall moral point of view does not involve the application of moral criteria. Rather, the evaluation of a morality takes us outside the province of morality. The result of sharpening this view is a doctrine called system relativism. System relativism is contrasted with other conceptions of moral relativism that have recently been propounded. It is argued that system relativism is the most defensible version.
Keywords David Lyons  Gilbert Harman  relativism
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9329.1988.tb00120.x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,979
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-08-24

Total views
63 ( #181,174 of 2,505,145 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,587 of 2,505,145 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes