Should we enhance animals?

Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (11):678-683 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Much bioethical discussion has been devoted to the subject of human enhancement through various technological means such as genetic modification. Although many of the same technologies could be, indeed in many cases already have been, applied to non-human animals, there has been very little consideration of the concept of “animal enhancement”, at least not in those specific terms. This paper addresses the notion of animal enhancement and the ethical issues surrounding it. A definition of animal enhancement is proposed that provides a framework within which to consider these issues; and it is argued that if human enhancement can be considered to be a moral obligation, so too can animal enhancement

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,174

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Animals and Sociology.Kay Peggs - 2012 - Palgrave-Macmillan.
Human Diets and Animal Welfare: The Illogic of the Larder. [REVIEW]Gaverick Matheny & Kai M. A. Chan - 2005 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 18 (6):579-594.
Kant's Treatment of Animals.Holly L. Wilson - 2011 - In Paul Pojman (ed.), Food Ethics. Wadsworth.
Rawls and Animals.Daniel A. Dombrowski - 1998 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 12 (1):63-77.
We Should Not Allow Dissection of Animals.Steve F. Sapontzis - 1995 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 8 (2):181-189.
Brains.Eric Olson - 2007 - In Eric T. Olson (ed.), What Are We? Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-13

Downloads
67 (#176,351)

6 months
2 (#275,027)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Sarah Chan
University of Edinburgh