The Hidden History of Phlogiston: How Philosophical Failure Can Generate Historiographical Refinement

Hyle 16 (2):47 - 79 (2010)

Authors
Hasok Chang
Cambridge University
Abstract
Historians often feel that standard philosophical doctrines about the nature and development of science are not adequate for representing the real history of science. However, when philosophers of science fail to make sense of certain historical events, it is also possible that there is something wrong with the standard historical descriptions of those events, precluding any sensible explanation. If so, philosophical failure can be useful as a guide for improving historiography, and this constitutes a significant mode of productive interaction between the history and the philosophy of science. I illustrate this methodological claim through the case of the Chemical Revolution. I argue that no standard philosophical theory of scientific method can explain why European chemists made a sudden and nearly unanimous switch of allegiance from the phlogiston theory to Lavoisier's theory. A careful re-examination of the history reveals that the shift was neither so quick nor so unanimous as imagined even by many historians. In closing I offer brief reflections on how best to explain the general drift toward Lavoisier's theory that did take place
Keywords Philosophy of Chemistry  Chemical Revolution  phlogiston  history and philosophy of science  scientific change  Lavoisier
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 39,645
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Scientific Understanding: Truth or Dare?Henk W. de Regt - 2015 - Synthese 192 (12):3781-3797.
Scientific Pluralism and the Chemical Revolution.Martin Kusch - 2015 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 49:69-79.
Inevitability, Contingency, and Epistemic Humility.Ian James Kidd - 2016 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 55:12-19.
The Chemical Revolution Revisited.Hasok Chang - 2015 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 49:91-98.

View all 13 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Conceptual Structure of the Chemical Revolution.Paul Thagard - 1990 - Philosophy of Science 57 (2):183-209.
From Phlogiston to Caloric: Chemical Ontologies. [REVIEW]Mi Kim - 2011 - Foundations of Chemistry 13 (3):201-222.
Phlogiston, Lavoisier and the Purloined Referent.Lucía Lewowicz - 2011 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 42 (3):436-444.
Thomas Kuhn and the Chemical Revolution.Paul Hoyningen-Huene - 2008 - Foundations of Chemistry 10 (2):101-115.
The Production of Purity as the Production of Knowledge.Jonathan Simon - 2012 - Foundations of Chemistry 14 (1):83-96.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-09-11

Total views
59 ( #124,715 of 2,325,862 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #219,205 of 2,325,862 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature