American Philosophical Quarterly 3 (Jan):77-188 (1966)
This is a boiled down version of my doctoral dissertation. Ryle wouldn’t publish it, claiming that it is like ‘a well sharpened pencil that no one will ever use.’ I guess he turned out to be right. Nevertheless I think it was, and is, a good paper.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Kinds of Kinds: A Conceptual Taxonomy of Psychiatric Categories.Nick Haslam - 2002 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 9 (3):203-217.
Moral Kinds and Natural Kinds.George Graham & Hugh LaFollette - 1982 - Journal of Value Inquiry 16 (2):85-99.
Interactive Kinds.Muhammad Ali Khalidi - 2010 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 61 (2):335-360.
Why Hacking is Wrong About Human Kinds.Rachel Cooper - 2004 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 55 (1):73-85.
From Cutting Nature at its Joints to Measuring It: New Kinds and New Kinds of People in Biology.Gordon McOuat - 2001 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 32 (4):613-645.
Biological Essentialism and the Tidal Change of Natural Kinds.John S. Wilkins - 2013 - Science and Education 22 (2):221-240.
The Problem of Processes and Transitions: Are Diseases Phase Kinds? [REVIEW]Stefan Dragulinescu - 2012 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 15 (1):79-89.
Added to index2009-07-10
Total downloads36 ( #143,537 of 2,171,693 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #326,424 of 2,171,693 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There is 1 thread in this forum
University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
In this paper I described three fundamentally different kinds of classes; but the idea of ‘natural kinds’ never crossed my mind. (That shows how long ago it was.)
I guess I now should say something like, “The extension of a ‘natural kind’ K is governed by the (usually hidden) features that are responsible for such and such observable distinguishing features in these (pointing) paradigmatic Ks.”
That would give us an important, and interesting fourth kind of class. Right?