Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (4):659-660 (2001)
We argue that confusability between items should be distinguished from generalization between items. Shepard's data concern confusability, but the theories proposed by Shepard and by Tenenbaum & Griffiths concern generalization, indicating a gap between theory and data. We consider the empirical and theoretical work involved in bridging this gap. [Shepard; Tenenbaum & Griffiths].
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Similarity as Transformation.Ulrike Hahn, Nick Chater & Lucy B. Richardson - 2003 - Cognition 87 (1):1-32.
Similar books and articles
Generalization and Tinbergen's Four Whys.Ken Cheng - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (4):660-661.
Extending Bayesian Concept Learning to Deal with Representational Complexity and Adaptation.Michael D. Lee - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (4):685-686.
Tribute to an Ideal Exemplar of Scientist and Person.Dominic W. Massaro - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (4):688-689.
Rethinking the Fallacy of Hasty Generalization.Douglas Walton - 1999 - Argumentation 13 (2):161-182.
Universal Bayesian Inference?David Dowe & Graham Oppy - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (4):662-663.
Generalization, Similarity, and Bayesian Inference.Joshua B. Tenenbaum & Thomas L. Griffiths - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (4):629-640.
Context Effects Equally Applicable in Generalization and Similarity.Emmanuel M. Pothos - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (4):699-700.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads8 ( #488,946 of 2,163,864 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #348,100 of 2,163,864 )
How can I increase my downloads?