Verbal Disputes

Philosophical Review 120 (4):515-566 (2011)
Authors
David Chalmers
New York University
Abstract
The philosophical interest of verbal disputes is twofold. First, they play a key role in philosophical method. Many philosophical disagreements are at least partly verbal, and almost every philosophical dispute has been diagnosed as verbal at some point. Here we can see the diagnosis of verbal disputes as a tool for philosophical progress. Second, they are interesting as a subject matter for first-order philosophy. Reflection on the existence and nature of verbal disputes can reveal something about the nature of concepts, language, and meaning. In this article I first characterize verbal disputes, spell out a method for isolating and resolving them, and draw out conclusions for philosophical methodology. I then use the framework to draw out consequences in first-order philosophy. In particular, I argue that the analysis of verbal disputes can be used to support the existence of a distinctive sort of primitive concept and that it can be used to reconstruct a version of an analytic/synthetic distinction, where both are characterized in dialectical terms alone
Keywords verbal disputes  philosophical methodology  concepts  analytic/synthetic distinction  disagreement
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1215/00318108-1334478
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 35,010
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

In Defense of the Metaphysics of Race.Adam Hochman - 2017 - Philosophical Studies 174 (11):2709–2729.
On the Very Concept of Free Will.Joshua May - 2014 - Synthese 191 (12):2849-2866.
Profiting From Poverty.Ole Koksvik & Gerhard Øverland - forthcoming - Canadian Journal of Philosophy:1-27.

View all 37 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Method of Verbal Dispute.Alan Sidelle - 2007 - Philosophical Topics 35 (1/2):83-113.
Merely Verbal Disputes.C. S. I. Jenkins - 2014 - Erkenntnis 79 (S1):11-30.
Is the Hirsch-Sider Dispute Merely Verbal?Gerald Marsh - 2010 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 88 (3):459-469.
Physical-Object Ontology, Verbal Disputes, and Common Sense.Eli Hirsch - 2005 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 70 (1):67–97.
Composition, Colocation, and Metaontology.Karen Bennett - 2009 - In David John Chalmers, David Manley & Ryan Wasserman (eds.), Metametaphysics: New Essays on the Foundations of Ontology. Oxford University Press. pp. 38.
Endurance, Perdurance, and Metaontology.Jiri Benovsky - 2011 - SATS: Northern European Journal of Philosophy (2):159-177.
Spory rzeczowe i słowne.Anna Brożek - 2012 - Filozofia Nauki 20 (4).
The "Tip of the Tongue" Phenomenon.R. Brown & David N. McNeill - 1966 - Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 5:325-37.
The Structure of Predication.Alessandro Lenci - 1998 - Synthese 114 (2):233-276.
On the Concept of Sexual Perversion.Kristie Miller - 2010 - Philosophical Quarterly 60 (241):808-830.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2011-09-24

Total downloads
871 ( #1,839 of 2,275,225 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
82 ( #3,927 of 2,275,225 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature