Verbal Disputes

Philosophical Review 120 (4):515-566 (2011)
Abstract
The philosophical interest of verbal disputes is twofold. First, they play a key role in philosophical method. Many philosophical disagreements are at least partly verbal, and almost every philosophical dispute has been diagnosed as verbal at some point. Here we can see the diagnosis of verbal disputes as a tool for philosophical progress. Second, they are interesting as a subject matter for first-order philosophy. Reflection on the existence and nature of verbal disputes can reveal something about the nature of concepts, language, and meaning. In this article I first characterize verbal disputes, spell out a method for isolating and resolving them, and draw out conclusions for philosophical methodology. I then use the framework to draw out consequences in first-order philosophy. In particular, I argue that the analysis of verbal disputes can be used to support the existence of a distinctive sort of primitive concept and that it can be used to reconstruct a version of an analytic/synthetic distinction, where both are characterized in dialectical terms alone
Keywords verbal disputes  philosophical methodology  concepts  analytic/synthetic distinction  disagreement
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1215/00318108-1334478
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 26,702
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
On the Very Concept of Free Will.Joshua May - 2014 - Synthese 191 (12):2849-2866.

View all 21 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles
The Method of Verbal Dispute.Alan Sidelle - 2007 - Philosophical Topics 35 (1/2):83-113.
Merely Verbal Disputes.C. S. I. Jenkins - 2014 - Erkenntnis 79 (1):11-30.
Is the Hirsch-Sider Dispute Merely Verbal?Gerald Marsh - 2010 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 88 (3):459-469.
Physical-Object Ontology, Verbal Disputes, and Common Sense.Eli Hirsch - 2005 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 70 (1):67–97.
Composition, Colocation, and Metaontology.Karen Bennett - 2009 - In David John Chalmers, David Manley & Ryan Wasserman (eds.), Metametaphysics: New Essays on the Foundations of Ontology. Oxford University Press. pp. 38.
Endurance, Perdurance, and Metaontology.Jiri Benovsky - 2011 - SATS: Northern European Journal of Philosophy (2):159-177.
Spory rzeczowe i słowne.Anna Brożek - 2012 - Filozofia Nauki 4.
The "Tip of the Tongue" Phenomenon.R. Brown & David N. McNeill - 1966 - Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 5:325-37.
The Structure of Predication.Alessandro Lenci - 1998 - Synthese 114 (2):233-276.
On the Concept of Sexual Perversion.Kristie Miller - 2010 - Philosophical Quarterly 60 (241):808-830.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2011-09-24

Total downloads

684 ( #1,604 of 2,158,463 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

42 ( #7,161 of 2,158,463 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums