Journal of Semantics 36 (3):531-547 (2019)
Authors | |
Abstract |
Content words are generally connected: there are no gaps in their denotations; no noun means ‘table or shoe’ or ‘animal or house’. We explore a formulation of connectedness which is applicable to content and logical words alike, and which compares well with the classic notion of monotonicity for quantifiers. On a first inspection, logical words satisfy this generalized version of the connectedness property at least as well as content words do — that is, both in terms of what may be observed in the lexicons of natural languages and in terms of acquisition biases. This reduces the putative differences between content and logical words, as well as the associated challenges that these differences would pose, e.g., for learners.
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
DOI | 10.1093/jos/ffz001 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Generalized Quantifiers and Natural Language.John Barwise & Robin Cooper - 1981 - Linguistics and Philosophy 4 (2):159--219.
Conceptual Spaces: The Geometry of Thought.Peter Gärdenfors - 2000 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 64 (1):180-181.
A Natural History of Negation.Jon Barwise & Laurence R. Horn - 1991 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 56 (3):1103.
View all 21 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
Learnability and Semantic Universals.Shane Steinert-Threlkeld & Jakub Szymanik - forthcoming - Semantics and Pragmatics.
Conceptual alternatives: Competition in language and beyond.Brian Buccola, Manuel Križ & Emmanuel Chemla - 2022 - Linguistics and Philosophy 45 (2):265-291.
Similar books and articles
Competition and Symmetry in an Artificial Word Learning Task.Brian Buccola, Isabelle Dautriche & Emmanuel Chemla - 2018 - Frontiers in Psychology 9.
Function and Content Words Evoke Different Brain Potentials.Robert M. Chapman - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (2):282-284.
Prospects for a Cognitive Norm Account of Logical Consequence.Thomas N. P. A. Brouwer - 2015 - In Pavel Arazim & Michal Danzak (eds.), The Logica Yearbook 2014. Rickmansworth: College Publications. pp. 13-32.
A New Theory of Content I: Basic Content. [REVIEW]Ken Gemes - 1994 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 23 (6):595 - 620.
Words Do Not Stand Alone: Do Not Ignore a Word's Role When Examining Patterns of Activation.Seth N. Greenberg & Monika Nisslein - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (2):289-290.
Information and Architecture.David Israel & John Perry - 1991 - In Jon Barwise, Jean Mark Gawron, Gordon Plotkin & Syun Tutiya (eds.), Situation Theory and Its Applications Vol. 2. Stanford: CSLI Publications. pp. 147-160.
Pragmatics and Logical Form.François Recanati - 2007 - In Esther Romero & Belen Soria (eds.), Explicit Communication: Robyn Carston's Pragmatics. Palgrave. pp. 25-41.
The Fundamental Features of Legal Rationality.Jean-Louis Gardies - 1988 - Ratio Juris 1 (3):241-251.
A New Theory of Content II: Model Theory and Some Alternatives. [REVIEW]Ken Gemes - 1997 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 26 (4):449-476.
Forma lógica/Formalización.John Corcoran - 2011 - In Luis Vega and Paula Olmos (ed.), Compendio de Lógica, Argumentación y Retórica. Editorial Trotta. pp. 257--258.
Content Externalism and Brute Logical Error.John M. Collins - 2008 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 38 (4):pp. 549-574.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2019-02-23
Total views
38 ( #300,784 of 2,518,488 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #271,901 of 2,518,488 )
2019-02-23
Total views
38 ( #300,784 of 2,518,488 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #271,901 of 2,518,488 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads