Trends in Cognitive Sciences 5 (4):141-142 (2001)

Anthony Chemero
University of Cincinnati
Markman and Dietrich1 recently recommended extending our understanding of representation to incorporate insights from some “alternative” theories of cognition: perceptual symbol systems, situated action, embodied cognition, and dynamical systems. In particular, they suggest that allowances be made for new types of representation which had been previously under-emphasized in cognitive science. The amendments they recommend are based upon the assumption that the alternative positions each agree with the classical view that cognition requires representations, internal mediating states that bear information.2 In the case of one of the alternatives, dynamical systems3, this is simply false: many dynamically-oriented cognitive scientists are anti-representationalists.4,5,6
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,163
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Making Space for Embodiment.Anthony P. Chemero - 2001 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 5 (7):317-318.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
129 ( #90,557 of 2,506,844 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,791 of 2,506,844 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes