Indestructibility properties of remarkable cardinals

Archive for Mathematical Logic 54 (7-8):961-984 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Remarkable cardinals were introduced by Schindler, who showed that the existence of a remarkable cardinal is equiconsistent with the assertion that the theory of L\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${L}$$\end{document} is absolute for proper forcing :176–184, 2000). Here, we study the indestructibility properties of remarkable cardinals. We show that if κ is remarkable, then there is a forcing extension in which the remarkability of κ becomes indestructible by all <κ-closed ≤κ-distributive forcing and all two-step iterations of the form Add∗R˙\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${Add*\dot{\mathbb R}}$$\end{document}, where R˙\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${\dot{\mathbb R}}$$\end{document} is forced to be <κ-closed and ≤κ-distributive. In the process, we introduce the notion of a remarkable Laver function and show that every remarkable cardinal carries such a function. We also show that remarkability is preserved by the canonical forcing of the GCH.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On the indestructibility aspects of identity crisis.Grigor Sargsyan - 2009 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 48 (6):493-513.
Proper forcing and remarkable cardinals II.Ralf-Dieter Schindler - 2001 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 66 (3):1481-1492.
Reducing the consistency strength of an indestructibility theorem.Arthur W. Apter - 2008 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 54 (3):288-293.
Strongly unfoldable cardinals made indestructible.Thomas A. Johnstone - 2008 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 73 (4):1215-1248.
Ramsey-like cardinals.Victoria Gitman - 2011 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 76 (2):519 - 540.
Indestructibility of Vopěnka’s Principle.Andrew D. Brooke-Taylor - 2011 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 50 (5-6):515-529.
Indestructibility and destructible measurable cardinals.Arthur W. Apter - 2016 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 55 (1-2):3-18.
An equiconsistency for universal indestructibility.Arthur W. Apter & Grigor Sargsyan - 2010 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 75 (1):314-322.
Making all cardinals almost Ramsey.Arthur W. Apter & Peter Koepke - 2008 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 47 (7-8):769-783.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-02-04

Downloads
36 (#421,132)

6 months
9 (#250,037)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Citations of this work

On c-extendible cardinals.Konstantinos Tsaprounis - 2018 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 83 (3):1112-1131.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Ramsey-like cardinals II.Victoria Gitman & P. D. Welch - 2011 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 76 (2):541-560.
Indestructible Strong Unfoldability.Joel David Hamkins & Thomas A. Johnstone - 2010 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 51 (3):291-321.
The wholeness axiom and Laver sequences.Paul Corazza - 2000 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 105 (1-3):157-260.
Proper forcing and remarkable cardinals.Ralf-Dieter Schindler - 2000 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 6 (2):176-184.

View all 8 references / Add more references