Justice: The neglected argument and the pregnant vision

Asian Philosophy 19 (2):189 – 198 (2009)
Abstract
Countering the present trend in the discourse on justice wherein human reason is perceived and marginalized as an embarrassment to justice and the trend to reject the concept of formal justice, this paper argues that there is formal justice and the essence of justice is setting things right and setting righteousness to stand straight. By this token, justice means the rule of reason, not the rule of power and desire, and the ethics of justice differs fundamentally from the ethics of care/benevolence. The popular assumption that justice as the rule of reason is incompatible with the idea of justice as accommodating diversity is unjustified. The paper joins the present discourse on justice from a historical perspective. It examines the historical Confucian and neo-Confucian concept of justice in a way of its dialogues with other Western concepts of justice such as Plato's concept of justice
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/09552360902943845
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,169
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Can Justice Be Based on Consent?Frank Lovett - 2004 - Journal of Political Philosophy 12 (1):79–101.
Benevolence and Justice.Yuval Livnat - 2003 - Journal of Value Inquiry 37 (4):507-515.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index
2010-05-07

Total downloads
30 ( #175,436 of 2,192,005 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #289,020 of 2,192,005 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature