Linguistics and Philosophy 34 (6):537-570 (2011)
Linguists often sharply distinguish the different modules that support linguistics competence, e.g., syntax, semantics, pragmatics. However, recent work has identified phenomena in syntax (polarity sensitivity) and pragmatics (implicatures), which seem to rely on semantic properties (monotonicity). We propose to investigate these phenomena and their connections as a window into the modularity of our linguistic knowledge. We conducted a series of experiments to gather the relevant syntactic, semantic and pragmatic judgments within a single paradigm. The comparison between these quantitative data leads us to four main results, (i) Our results support a departure from one element of the classical Gricean approach, thus helping to clarify and settle an empirical debate. This first outcome also confirms the soundness of the methodology, as the results align with standard contemporary accounts of scalar implicature (SI), (ii) We confirm that the formal semantic notion of monotonicity underlies negative polarity item (NPI) syntactic acceptability, but (iii) our results indicate that the notion needed is perceived monotonicity. We see results (ii) and (iii) as the main contribution of this study: (ii) provides an empirical interpretation and confirmation of one of the insights of the model-theoretic approach to semantics, while (iii) calls for an incremental, cognitive implementation of the current generalizations, (iv) Finally, our results do not indicate that the relationship between NPI acceptability and monotonicity is mediated by pragmatic features related to Sis: this tells against elegant attempts to unify polarity sensitivity and Sis (pioneered by Krifka and Chierchia). These results illustrate a new methodology for integrating theoretically rigorous work in formal semantics with an experimentally-grounded cognitively-oriented view of linguistic competence
|Keywords||Modularity Polarity Scalar implicatures Monotonicity Intuitions Experiment|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature.Stephen C. Levinson - 2000 - MIT Press.
The Semantic Conception of Truth: And the Foundations of Semantics.Alfred Tarski - 1943 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 4 (3):341-376.
The Grammatical View of Scalar Implicatures and the Relationship Between Semantics and Pragmatics.Gennaro Chierchia & Danny Fox - unknown
Formal Philosophy; Selected Papers of Richard Montague.Richard Montague - 1974 - New Haven: Yale University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Predicting Moral Judgments From Causal Judgments.Emmanuel Chemla, Paul Egré & Philippe Schlenker - 2015 - Philosophical Psychology 28 (1):21-48.
Experiments on the Acceptability and Possible Readings of Questions Embedded Under Emotive-Factives.Alexandre Cremers & Emmanuel Chemla - forthcoming - Natural Language Semantics:1-39.
Propositional Attitudes Towards Presuppositions.Filippo Domaneschi, Elena Carrea, Alberto Greco & Carlo Penco - 2016 - Pragmatics and Cognitionpragmatics and Cognition 22 (3):291-308.
Similar books and articles
Some Remarks on Polarity Items.Manfred Krifka - 1991 - In Dietmar Zaefferer (ed.), Semantic Universals and Universal Semantics. Foris Publications. pp. 150--189.
Japanese Indeterminate Negative Polarity Items and Their Scope.J. Shimoyama - 2011 - Journal of Semantics 28 (4):413-450.
Negative Polarity Items in Questions: Strength as Relevance.R. van Rooy - 2003 - Journal of Semantics 20 (3):239-273.
How to Be Universal When You Are Existential: Negative Polarity Items in the Comparative: Entailment Along a Scale.A. Zepter - 2003 - Journal of Semantics 20 (2):193-237.
There is No Number Effect in the Licensing of Negative Polarity Items: A Reply to Guerzoni and Sharvit. [REVIEW]Jack Hoeksema - 2008 - Linguistics and Philosophy 31 (4):397-407.
Licensing and Sensitivity in Polarity Items: From Downward Entailment to (Non)Veridicality.Anastasia Giannakidou - manuscript
'Only' Noun Phrases, Pseudo-Negative Generalized Quantifiers, Negative Polarity Items, and Monotonicity.J. Atlas - 1996 - Journal of Semantics 13 (4):265-328.
The Dependency of the Subjunctive Revisited: Temporal Semantics and Polarity.Anastasia Giannakidou - manuscript
The Semantics of Scandinavian Free Choice Items.Kjell Johan Saeboe - 2001 - Linguistics and Philosophy 24 (6):737-788.
Negative Contexts: Collocation, Polarity and Multiple Negation.Ton van der Wouden - 1997 - Routledge.
From Hell to Polarity: Aggressively Non-D-Linked Wh-Phrases as Polarity Items.Anastasia Giannakidou & Marcel den Dikken - manuscript
Added to index2012-04-20
Total downloads67 ( #76,191 of 2,153,475 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #225,533 of 2,153,475 )
How can I increase my downloads?