Philosophy and Literature 41 (2):471-482 (2017)

Authors
Melvin Chen
Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
Abstract
What is philosophy and literature? It is (or at least ought to be) a truth universally acknowledged that this is a question to which there are no easy answers. Does philosophy and literature constitute a subdiscipline of philosophy, as logic, epistemology, metaphysics, ethics, philosophy of science, and even philosophy of religion do? Alternatively: ought it constitute a subdiscipline of philosophy if it does not already do so? What is the nature of the relationship between philosophy and literature and literary and philosophical studies? Where might its limits be located? These are some of the important questions that intellectuals who have worked in this field from its inception have sought to address. The answers yielded thus far by their combined efforts, however, have been unsatisfying. The purpose of this essay therefore is to attempt to shed further light on the nature of the field of philosophy and literature and its limits, with the accompanying hope that, as philosophy and literature gains in coherence, rigor, and organization, its credibility as a field will be raised in some modest measure among my philosophical colleagues.
Keywords Philosophy & Literature  Paradox of Continual Beginning  Philosophy and Literature
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2018
DOI 10.1353/phl.2017.0052
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 63,206
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Review of Azar Nafisi, Reading Lolita in Tehran: A Memoir of Books. [REVIEW]Rory J. Conces - 2004 - International Third World Studies Journal and Review 15:23-25.
Solzhenitsyn.William David Graf (ed.) - 1969 - Cambridge: MIT Press.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-02-08

Total views
40 ( #268,102 of 2,448,343 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #450,223 of 2,448,343 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes