Process theism and physical evil

Sophia 31 (3):16-27 (1992)

Abstract

Process theism has been in the limelight for the past few decades for its controversial and refreshing conception of God. One aspect of process theism that has received increasing attention is process theodicy. However, in regard to this problem, it must be said that none of the process philosophers had devoted more attention to it than Charles Hartshorne. This paper reviews Hartshorne's strategy for a process solution of physical evil. The conclusion is that Hartshorne's attempt to collapse the problem of physical evil into the problem of moral evil via the free-will defence and pan-psychism is bogged down by a serious hitch

Download options

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 72,694

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-03

Downloads
19 (#587,809)

6 months
2 (#259,476)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Omnipotence and Other Theological Mistakes.Charles Hartshorne - 1984 - State University of New York Press.

Add more references

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles