Developing World Bioethics 1 (1):57-68 (2001)

Abstract
There is international recognition of the need for sustainable research ethics committees to provide ethical review of human subjects research in developing countries, but many developing countries do not have such committees . Theoretical and practical uncertainties encountered by an IRB on the Caribbean island of Grenada offer insight into ethical review of research in developing countries. Theoretical uncertainties include questions about whether means of ensuring confidentiality and obtaining informed consent will be effective in local settings, and whether deviations from Western norms are justifiable. International guidelines are helpful in addressing these concerns, but are subject to interpretation. Guidelines are less helpful in practical areas like selecting members or chairs. They do not address what sort of procedures and paperwork will work in a developing country, or IRBs’ relationships to governments that have no mandate for them. Experiences presented here show that IRBs in developing countries can sustainably adhere to international standards. Sustainability requires knowledge, personal commitment, and an official mandate to uphold international standards. Capacity building must therefore focus on educational programs to make developing country leaders knowledgeable about the value of international guidelines to their nations. Such knowledge is needed before people will become motivated to promote, implement, and uphold the guidelines. People in developing countries must help design bridges to help their nations put international standards into practice. The structure of such bridges may, of necessity, vary in different settings
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/1471-8847.00008
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,066
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Assessment of the Ethical Review Process in Sudan.Dya Eldin M. Elsayed & Nancy E. Kass - 2007 - Developing World Bioethics 7 (3):143–148.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Research Ethics Committees: A Regional Approach.Cheryl Cox Macpherson - 1999 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 20 (2):161-179.
Ethics in Research in Mathematics Education.Allan Okech - 2010 - Journal of Academic Ethics 8 (2):129-135.
Against One-Size-Fits-All Research Ethics.Michelle N. Meyer - 2010 - Hastings Center Report 40 (5):10-11.
The OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises.Claes Hägg - 1984 - Journal of Business Ethics 3 (1):71 - 76.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-08-30

Total views
14 ( #728,702 of 2,498,779 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #422,193 of 2,498,779 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes