The limitless first incompleteness theorem

Logic Journal of the IGPL 33 (3) (2025)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This work is motivated by the problem of finding the limit of the applicability of the first incompleteness theorem ($\textsf{G1}$). A natural question is, can we find a minimal theory for which $\textsf{G1}$ holds? We examine the Turing degree structure of recursively enumerable (RE) theories for which $\textsf{G1}$ holds and the interpretation degree structure of RE theories weaker than the theory $\textbf{R}$ with respect to interpretation for which $\textsf{G1}$ holds. We answer all questions that we posed in [2], and prove more results about them. It is known that there are no minimal essentially undecidable theories with respect to interpretation. We generalize this result and give some general characterizations, which tell us under what conditions there are no minimal RE theories having some property with respect to interpretation.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 107,499

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2025-04-24

Downloads
8 (#1,685,804)

6 months
8 (#669,926)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Yong Cheng
Wuhan University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Cuts, consistency statements and interpretations.Pavel Pudlák - 1985 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 50 (2):423-441.
Essential hereditary undecidability.Albert Visser - 2024 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 63 (5):529-562.
Current Research on Gödel’s Incompleteness Theorems.Yong Cheng - 2021 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 27 (2):113-167.
Finding the limit of incompleteness I.Yong Cheng - 2020 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 26 (3-4):268-286.

View all 11 references / Add more references