The object bias and the study of scientific revolutions: Lessons from developmental psychology

Philosophical Psychology 20 (4):479 – 503 (2007)
I propose a new perspective on the study of scientific revolutions. This is a transformation from an object-only perspective to an ontological perspective that properly treats objects and processes as distinct kinds. I begin my analysis by identifying an object bias in the study of scientific revolutions, where it takes the form of representing scientific revolutions as changes in classification of physical objects. I further explore the origins of this object bias. Findings from developmental psychology indicate that children cannot distinguish processes from objects until the age of 7, but they have already developed a core system of object knowledge as early as 4 months of age. The persistence of this core system is responsible for the object bias among mature adults, i.e., the tendency to apply knowledge of physical objects to temporal processes. In light of the distinction between physical objects and temporal processes, I redraw the picture of the Copernican revolution. Rather than seeing it as a taxonomic shift from a geocentric to a heliocentric cosmology, we should understand it as a transformation from a conceptual system that was built around an object concept to one that was built around a process concept.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/09515080701441744
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 31,836
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas S. Kuhn - 1962 - University of Chicago Press.
Conceptual Revolutions.Paul Thagard - 1992 - Princeton University Press.
How to Build a Baby: II. Conceptual Primitives.Jean M. Mandler - 1992 - Psychological Review 99 (4):587-604.
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas S. Kuhn - 1964 - Philosophical Quarterly 14 (57):377-379.

View all 28 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
A Different Kind of Revolutionary Change: Transformation From Object to Process Concepts.Xiang Chen - 2010 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 41 (2):182-191.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index

Total downloads
38 ( #154,577 of 2,231,650 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #264,937 of 2,231,650 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature