Politics, Philosophy and Economics 15 (1):92-110 (2016)

Abstract
Philip Pettit’s conception of freedom as nondomination is modally robust in that it requires not simply reducing the probability of uncontrolled interference by others but entirely eliminating that possibility. In this article, I consider whether freedom as nondomination provides an attractive analysis of official discretion, particularly in the context of the criminal law, an area of recurring interest for Pettit. I argue that not only does the modally robust character of freedom as nondomination have some rather unattractive implications in the criminal law, but that it sits poorly with Pettit’s more general ambitions to provide a consequentialist framework for the evaluation of social institutions. Drawing on recent work by Niko Kolodny, I develop an ‘anti-deference’ interpretation of nondomination and contrast it to Pettit’s modally robust conception.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1177/1470594x15599104
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 63,247
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

What is the Point of Equality?Elizabeth Anderson - 1999 - Ethics 109 (2):287-337.
Taking Rights Seriously.Ronald Dworkin - 1979 - Ethics 90 (1):121-130.
Republicanism.Philip Pettit - 2000 - Mind 109 (435):640-644.
Taking Rights Seriously.Alan R. White - 1977 - Philosophical Quarterly 27 (109):379-380.

View all 15 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Tendencies of the Development of the Lithuanian Criminal Procedure Law.Rima Azubalyte - 2010 - Jurisprudencija: Mokslo darbu žurnalas 119 (1):281-296.
Aspiration of the Criminal Procedure – the Truth.Tomas Rudzkis & Artūras Panomariovas - 2011 - Jurisprudencija: Mokslo darbu žurnalas 18 (2):739-754.
Criminal Procedure Involving the Disabled Persons (text only in German.Jolanta Zajanckauskiene - 2010 - Jurisprudencija: Mokslo darbu žurnalas 119 (1):331-349.
Pre-Trial Proceedings in the Czech Republic.Marek Frystak - 2010 - Jurisprudencija: Mokslo darbu žurnalas 121 (3):251-267.
Why Criminal Law: A Question of Content? [REVIEW]Douglas Husak - 2008 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 2 (2):99-122.
The Risks of Interrogation with the Help of an Interpreter in the Criminal Procedure.Csilla Hati - 2017 - Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 49 (1):125-139.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-09-05

Total views
37 ( #291,023 of 2,448,508 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,843 of 2,448,508 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes