Defining the Term "Argument"

Informal Logic 15 (3) (1993)

Informal logic has expanded the concept of an 'argument' beyond that presented traditionally by formal logicians-to include arguments as encountered in 'real-life'. Existent definitions of argument structure are argued to be inadequate by failing to fully recognise that, ultimately, arguments have a human source. Accordingly, a new definition is proposed which appeals to relevant cognitive and behavioural factors. The definition retains some traditional concepts, but introduces the term 'supportive' as a modification to 'premiss'. The concept of a 'persuader' is also developed. The definition is argued to capture more fully the intricacies, subtleties and rich diversity of informal arguments
Keywords argument, definition, informal logic, human factors
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 43,865
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation.Chaïm Perelman - 1969 - Notre Dame, [Ind.]University of Notre Dame Press.
The Uses of Argument.STEPHEN TOULMIN - 1958 - Philosophy 34 (130):244-245.
The Recent Development of Informal Logic.Ralph H. Johnson & J. Anthony Blair - forthcoming - Informal Logic: The First International Symposium.

View all 36 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Argument of the Beard.Douglas Walton - 1996 - Informal Logic 18 (2).
Logic, Art and Argument.Leo Groarke - 1996 - Informal Logic 18 (2).
Making Sense of “Informal Logic”.Ralph H. Johnson - 2006 - Informal Logic 26 (3):231-258.


Added to PP index

Total views
9 ( #775,351 of 2,266,100 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #855,138 of 2,266,100 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes

Sign in to use this feature