Democracy without Autonomy: Moral and Personal Autonomy in Democratic Confucianism

Philosophy East and West 67 (1):47-60 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The presence and absence of autonomy in Joseph Chan’s democratic Confucianism loom large, but not always in the ways that he maintains. Although Chan claims that his reconstruction of Confucianism for modern democracy can accept some forms of moral autonomy, what he presents does not constitute genuine moral autonomy, and the absence of that autonomy sits in tension with some other aspects of his model. When it comes to personal autonomy, it is the opposite: Chan says that the exercise of personal autonomy can be part of a life well-lived but is not strictly necessary and can be outweighed by perfectionist considerations of well-being and ethics; however, his model incorporates and relies on the exercise of personal autonomy and leaves room for its intrinsic value.

Similar books and articles

Moral Autonomy, Civil Liberties, and Confucianism.Joseph Chan - 2002 - Philosophy East and West 52 (3):281-310.
How to Distinguish Autonomy From Integrity.Carolyn McLeod - 2005 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 35 (1):107 - 134.
Autonomy, Consent and the Law.Sheila McLean - 2009 - Routledge-Cavendish.
Autonomy Modest.Rüdiger Bittner - 2014 - Erkenntnis 79 (S7):1-11.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-12-29

Downloads
273 (#42,372)

6 months
35 (#29,938)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Yvonne Chiu
U.S. Naval War College

Citations of this work

The Individualistic Roots of Virtue.Yvonne Chiu - 2022 - Journal of Social and Political Philosophy 1 (1):79-84.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Political Liberalism.John Rawls - 1993 - Columbia University Press.
Practical Philosophy.Immanuel Kant - 1996 - Cambridge University Press.
Political Liberalism by John Rawls. [REVIEW]Philip Pettit - 1994 - Journal of Philosophy 91 (4):215-220.

View all 13 references / Add more references